From the regulation of marijuana use to the nuclear-free zone declaration, the city of Berkeley is generally known for its policies that challenge federal law. Although such deviations could potentially set dangerous precedence for the future, this attitude should continue to be adopted when dealing with the particular issue of illegal immigration.

Last week’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in Berkeley and Oakland residences place the safe sanctuary resolution back under the microscope for scrutiny. Passed by the City Council in 1971 and reaffirmed last year, the policy does not prevent federal agents from doing their jobs, but also does not compel Berkeley city employees to assist in the enforcement of federal immigration law (unless by doing so they are breaking state or federal law).

This is not simply a symbolic gesture-the effects of the resolution are practical, conscientious to the way city resources should be used. Instead of forcing police officers to search for suspected illegal immigrants on an individual “Where’s Waldo?” basis, the more effective approach would be to choose a target closer to the root of the problem, a task that shouldn’t even be assigned to the municipal level.

Berkeley’s decision to provide a safe zone for illegal immigrants benefits all parties involved. For illegal immigrants, starting proceedings to attain legal status won’t be as daunting without another layer of deportation agents to fear. For the city, hard-working immigrants can be conducive to the productiveness of the community. For those who fear an explosion of the illegal immigrant population, keep in mind that federal regulations are still in place and have the power to trump the city’s resolution.

Adhering to stances that quasi-defy federal law might have consequences in the long run. But in this case, Berkeley’s welcoming atmosphere is appropriate.